Skip to main content
· 12/2/1986

State v. Janda

Citations

  • 397 N.W.2d 59
  • 1986 N.D. LEXIS 459

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing cases expressing serious reservations about the efficacy of curative instructions
  • no error in admitting statement made to hospital nurse on duty when victim arrived for examination because “the purpose of an examination of the kind involved here is not just the preservation of evidence, but diagnosis and treatment as well”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Erickstad, Gierke, Levine, Meschke, Vande, Walle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.