Skip to main content

State v. Long

Citations

  • 975 A.2d 660
  • 293 Conn. 31
  • 2009 Conn. LEXIS 220

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • jury’s finding of not guilty of more serious charge indicated that defendant was not prejudiced
  • “[a]n improper appeal to the jurors’ emotions can take the form of a personal attack on the defendant’s character”
  • “prosecutor . . . is not barred from commenting on the evidence presented at trial or urging the jury to draw reasonable inferences from the evidence that support the state’s theory of the case”
  • prosecutor should not be put in rhetorical straightjacket
  • prosecutor should not be put in rhetorical straight-jacket
  • ‘‘[t]he question of whether the defendant has been prejudiced by prosecutorial [impro- priety] . . . depends on whether there is a reasonable likelihood that the jury’s verdict would have been differ- ent absent the sum total of the improprieties’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers, Katz, Palmer, Vertefeuille, Zarella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.