People v. Manyik

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the district court's ruling that the defendant did not establish excusable neglect for withdrawing his late motion to withdraw a plea
• \[I]gnorance of the law should not constitute excusable neglect for inmates or criminal defendants under K.S.A. 2015 Supp. 22–3210(e)(2).\
• \[I]gnorance of the law should not constitute excusable neglect for inmates or criminal defendants under K.S.A. 2015 Supp. 22-3210(e)(2).\
• judicial discretion is abused if substantial competent evidence does not support a factual finding on which such discretion is based
• ignorance of law will not permit criminal defendant to proceed with untimely motion to withdraw plea

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).