State v. Diaz
Citations
- 348 Conn. 750
Syllabus
Convicted of the crimes of felony murder, burglary in the first degree, conspiracy to commit burglary in the first degree, attempt to commit robbery in the first degree, and criminal possession of a firearm in connection with the shooting death of the victim, the defendant appealed to this court. At trial, one of the defendant's accomplices, D, testified pursuant to a cooperation agreement with the state. D testified that, on the night of the murder, she had driven her boyfriend, J, and J's friend, who allegedly was the defendant and went by the name ''E,'' to the victim's house to buy drugs. Once they arrived, J informed D that they were going to rob the victim. D and E approached the house while J waited across the street. When the victim opened the door, E drew a gun and barged into the victim's house. D was scared and ran back to the car, where she met J. According to D, she heard a gunshot as she fled. The defendant testified in his own defense. Although he admitted that he went to the victim's house with J and D to buy drugs, he testified that he stayed near the car while J and D approached the house and that, after ten to fifteen minutes, he heard a gunshot. According to the defendant, J handed D a gun when J reentered the car. While cross- examining the defendant, the prosecutor indicated that a video recording of the defendant's interviews with the police, in which the defendant made certain statements that were inconsistent with his trial testimony, would be played at a later point in the trial. The video recordings, however, ultimately were not offered into evidence. During rebuttal argument, the prosecutor remarked on D's credibility, stating that either D or the defendant was ''completely wrong'' because their testimony was not consistent. The prosecutor also made remarks regarding the fact that the defendant, during his testimony, did not express outrage toward others who had implicated him or who had testified against him, and then proceeded to ask th
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- lying to police can indicate consciousness of guilt
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robinson; McDonald; D’Auria; Mullins; Ecker; Alexander; Dannehy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. DabateSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-03-11· cited 15×
- State v. HonschSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2024-07-19· cited 13×
- State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-07-22· cited 3×
- State v. CooperSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-09-30· cited 3×
- State v. BesterSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-12-09· cited 1×
- State v. MebaneSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2024-08-20
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- State v. StevensonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-06-15· cited 228×
- State v. SinghSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-03-26· cited 212×
- State v. SharpeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-04-16· cited 175×
- State v. LedbetterSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-09-27· cited 145×
- State v. LusterSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-08-15· cited 92×
- State v. McClainSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2017-03-14· cited 85×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-08-30· cited 74×
- State v. BarnesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-05-02· cited 74×
- State v. BellSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-09-11· cited 65×
- State v. DelvalleSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-08-24· cited 58×
- State v. LongSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-08-11· cited 57×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-11-19· cited 47×
- United States v. GainesSecond Circuit· 2006-07-20· cited 45×
- State v. Patrick M.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-09-02· cited 42×
- United States v. BrutusSecond Circuit· 2007-10-02· cited 40×
- State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2020-02-18· cited 38×
- State v. BlaineSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2019-12-31· cited 35×
- State v. Courtney G.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2021-06-21· cited 30×
- State v. AponteSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-02-26· cited 30×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.