United States v. James Woodrow Rudinsky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the defendant was in custody where he was substantially deprived of “freedom of movement and association” while confined at a community treatment center
• finding that the defendant was in custody where he was substantially deprived of “freedom of move- ment and association” while confined at a community treat- ment center
• “A person may still be in custody, even though not under constant supervision of guards, so long as there is some restraint upon his complete freedom.”
• prisoner with outside employment attached to treatment center failed to return

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).