E. Paul Black v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• nothing in Michelson inconsistent with interpreting Edgington as not requiring \standing alone\ instruction
• nothing in Michelson inconsistent with interpreting Edgington as not requiring “standing alone” instruction
• finding circumstantial evi- dence of willfulness sufficient to suport conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).