Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 5/25/2000

State v. Long

Citations

45 S.W.3d 611
2000 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 409
2000 WL 680367

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that, where evidence is not sufficient to support the greater offense but is sufficient to support the lesser-included offense, an appellate court may order reduction in the degree of the offense for which the defendant could be convicted
―[T]his Court has the authority to order a reduction in the degree of the offense for which Defendant could be convicted‖
“When reversal and remand is based on an error at trial, rather than evidentiary insufficiency, the Double Jeopardy Clause does not bar Defendant’s retrial.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Woodall, Smith, Lafferty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.