Supreme Court of Minnesota· 11/5/1998
State v. Kennedy
Citations
- 585 N.W.2d 385
- 1998 Minn. LEXIS 783
- 1998 WL 768071
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that evidence of subsequent sexual assault crimes properly offered to refute defendant's claim that victim's testimony was a fabrication in criminal sexual conduct trial
- holding that Spreigl evidence “need not be 9 identical”
- referring to the requirement for admission of Spreigl evidence as a \procedural safeguard\
- “While it is important to make plain that such bad act evidence cannot be used to prove action in conformity therewith, it can be used to show a link between the bad act and the charged offense in order to establish a modus operandi * * *.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Russell A. Anderson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In the Interest of B.D.-Y.Supreme Court of Kansas· 2008-07-18· cited 492×
- State v. NessSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-01-10· cited 107×
- State v. BlomSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-07-01· cited 103×
- State v. BartyllaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-08-21· cited 90×
- State v. VickSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2001-08-30· cited 70×
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-08-28· cited 55×
- State v. FardanSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-10-22· cited 54×
- State v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-03-17· cited 53×
- State v. CourtneySupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-05-12· cited 52×
- State v. GomezSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-09-28· cited 50×
- State of Minnesota v. Diamond Lee Jamal GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2016-11-16· cited 48×
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-03-18· cited 45×
- Angus v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-04-28· cited 43×
- State v. GutierrezSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-08-21· cited 43×
- State v. RiddleySupreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-11-25· cited 35×
- State v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2008-09-02· cited 34×
- State v. AsfeldSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-06-12· cited 30×
- State v. StewartSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-05-09· cited 27×
- Dillon v. Seattle Deposition Reporters, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-01-21· cited 26×
- State v. BurrellSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-08-20· cited 25×
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. SpreiglSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1965-12-17· cited 368×
- State v. MyersSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-12-21· cited 253×
- State v. BillstromSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1967-03-10· cited 160×
- State v. BolteSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-04-14· cited 98×
- State v. FilippiSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-07-01· cited 78×
- State v. WermerskirchenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1993-03-12· cited 77×
- State v. DeWaldSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1991-01-18· cited 76×
- Weber Ex Rel. Weber v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-08-18· cited 76×
- State v. SlowinskiSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-01-12· cited 73×
- State v. GlazeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-03-16· cited 60×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-08-28· cited 59×
- State v. LindahlSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-08-28· cited 45×
- State v. SteinbuchSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-04-08· cited 38×
- State v. DeBaereSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-10-12· cited 33×
- State v. BerrySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-05-01· cited 32×
- State v. MattesonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-11-16· cited 30×
- State v. VolstadSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-01-11· cited 28×
- State v. LandinSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1991-08-02· cited 24×
- State v. CogshellSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-10-06· cited 23×
- State v. StaggSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-01-13· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.