Skip to main content

State v. Lewis

Citations

  • 609 S.E.2d 515
  • 363 S.C. 37
  • 2005 S.C. LEXIS 53

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to require trial courts to evaluate factors enunciated in Neil v. Biggers , 409 U.S. 188, 199 (1972
  • “We conclude, as the majority of courts have, that Neil v. Biggers does not apply to in-court identifications and that the remedy for any alleged suggestiveness of an in-court identification is cross- examination and argument.”
  • remedy for alleged suggestiveness is cross-examination and argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Toal, Waller, Burnett, Rawl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.