Coleman v. Hogan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allowing a constitutionally proper reason to override a constitutionally infirm reason if the acceptable reason is given later would erode the constitutional protections enunciated in Batson and its progeny
• agreeing with “majority of states that the choice of [Batson violation] remedy should be within the discretion of the trial court”
• agreeing \with majority of states that the choice of remedy should be within the discretion of the trial court\
• agreeing with the majority of states that, when tasked with “prescribing the appropriate remedy for the unconstitutional exercise of a peremptory strike . . . the choice of remedy should be within the discretion of the trial court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).