Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2/25/2002
State v. Cheatham
Citations
- 561 S.E.2d 618
- 349 S.C. 101
- 2002 S.C. App. LEXIS 24
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the trial court did not err in denying defendant's request to limit the State to proof of only the \nighttime\ element of first-degree burglary
- stating Simmons rule that harmless error rule may be applicable if identification is corroborated by either circumstantial or direct evidence
- stating Simmons rule that harmless error rule may be applicable if identification is corroborated by either circumstantial or direct evidence
- \It is not enough for a party seeking disqualification to simply allege bias. The party must show some evidence of bias.\
- \Evidence of other crimes is admissible to establish a material fact or element of the crime charged.\
- in camera hearing required by Rule 104(c
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Cureton, Goolsby
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-02-22· cited 49×
- State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-07-01· cited 35×
- State v. GillianCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-06-28· cited 34×
- State v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-11-25· cited 34×
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-02-22· cited 32×
- State v. FletcherCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-01-31· cited 23×
- State v. FrippCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-01-18· cited 15×
- State v. LivermanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-12-04· cited 11×
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-06-28· cited 3×
- State v. LewisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-02-18· cited 2×
- State v. GleatonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2024-08-07
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court· 1972-12-06· cited 7,056×
- Watkins v. SowdersSupreme Court· 1981-01-13· cited 334×
- State v. McDonaldSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-12-18· cited 92×
- State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-03-12· cited 71×
- State v. BentonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-01-10· cited 69×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-08-24· cited 63×
- Mallett v. MallettCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-05-28· cited 59×
- State v. McKnightSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-10-22· cited 30×
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1971-01-13· cited 29×
- State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-06-16· cited 26×
- Christensen v. MikellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-09-23· cited 23×
- State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-04-27· cited 21×
- Christy v. ChristyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1994-11-04· cited 21×
- State v. RamseySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-07-23· cited 19×
- Parker v. ShecutCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-05-22· cited 15×
- State v. TillmanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1991-05-28· cited 14×
- State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-07-15· cited 13×
- State v. MabeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-12-09· cited 11×
- State v. CashSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1971-12-02· cited 10×
- State v. PrimusSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-01-10· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.