Supreme Court of Vermont· 2/2/1998
State v. Leggett
Citations
- 709 A.2d 491
- 167 Vt. 438
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that evidence that the defendant was in a private residence with two minors on multiple occasions was enough to support finding that the defendant violated probation condition prohibiting contact with minors
- concluding that evidence that the defendant was in a private residence with two minors on multiple occasions was enough to support finding that the defendant violated probation condition prohibiting contact with minors
- noting that a probationer’s own implausible and inherently contradictory explanation of events can corroborate the State’s case
- noting that a probationer's own implausible and inherently contradictory explanation of events can corroborate the State's case
- declining to adopt per se rule requiring reversal whenever hearsay testimony is admitted without a finding of good cause to dispense with a probationer's confrontation right
- declining to adopt per se rule requiring reversal whenever hearsay testimony is admitted without a finding of good cause to dispense with a probationer’s confrontation right
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Amestoy, Gibson, Dooley, Morse, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hacker, Anthony WayneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2013-01-16· cited 484×
- People v. DevorssColorado Court of Appeals· 2011-03-31· cited 35×
- State v. DanaherSupreme Court of Vermont· 2002-11-20· cited 28×
- State v. DecoteauSupreme Court of Vermont· 2007-08-31· cited 27×
- State v. RiversSupreme Court of Vermont· 2005-06-10· cited 23×
- State v. BlaiseSupreme Court of Vermont· 2012-01-06· cited 19×
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of Vermont· 2005-08-19· cited 14×
- State v. HazeltonSupreme Court of Vermont· 2009-08-21· cited 7×
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of Vermont· 2010-03-08· cited 2×
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 10,835×
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
- Black v. RomanoSupreme Court· 1985-07-01· cited 620×
- United States v. William Joseph FrazierEleventh Circuit· 1994-07-14· cited 240×
- United States v. Bruce BellEighth Circuit· 1986-03-10· cited 155×
- United States v. Larry J. MeeksSecond Circuit· 1994-06-02· cited 96×
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of Vermont· 1996-08-09· cited 85×
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Vermont· 1996-01-12· cited 44×
- Jakab v. JakabSupreme Court of Vermont· 1995-06-23· cited 42×
- Richard v. RichardSupreme Court of Vermont· 1985-09-13· cited 41×
- State v. PercySupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-01-22· cited 40×
- State v. TherrienSupreme Court of Vermont· 1982-02-02· cited 36×
- Gilbert v. GilbertSupreme Court of Vermont· 1995-05-12· cited 34×
- In re B.S.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1995-03-31· cited 32×
- State v. LyndsSupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-10-25· cited 28×
- United States v. Rick R. LaceyFifth Circuit· 1981-06-19· cited 27×
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Vermont· 1980-11-05· cited 25×
- State v. EmerySupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-04-19· cited 20×
- State v. BusheySupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-02-26· cited 19×
- State v. StylesSupreme Court of Vermont· 1997-04-01· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.