Skip to main content

In re B.S.

Citations

  • 163 Vt. 445
  • 659 A.2d 1137
  • 1995 Vt. LEXIS 46
  • 1995 WL 217797

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that 42 C.F.R. §§ 2.63 and 2.64 should be read together
  • recognizing that party must establish prejudice from alleged errors to warrant reversal
  • explaining that erroneous admission of evidence is grounds for reversal only if it resulted in prejudice
  • stating that “erroneous admission of evidence is grounds for reversal only if a substantial right of the party is affected”
  • noting that reversal is required only where error results in prejudice
  • noting that reversal is required only where error results in prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, Dooley, Gibson, Johnson, Morse

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.