Supreme Court of Vermont· 1/22/1988
State v. Percy
Citations
- 548 A.2d 408
- 149 Vt. 623
- 1988 Vt. LEXIS 84
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing due process right to reciprocal discovery as developed in Wardius v. Oregon, 412 U.S. 470, 93 S.Ct. 2208, 37 L.Ed.2d 82 (1973)
- discussing due process right to reciprocal discovery as developed in Wardius v. Oregon, 412 U.S. 470 (1973)
- rejecting due process claim for expert evaluation of complaining witness where alternative sources were available for information
- denying access to information obtained in therapeutic relationship and not held by State
- due process right to reciprocal discovery not violated where court permitted State expert to interview defendant but defendant's expert was not permitted to interview victim
- due process right to reciprocal discovery not violated where court permitted State expert to interview defendant but defendant’s expert was not permitted to interview victim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen, Dooley, Barney, Keyser, Costello
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. RoySupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-01-13· cited 85×
- State v. StreichSupreme Court of Vermont· 1995-02-17· cited 80×
- State v. SimoneauSupreme Court of Vermont· 2003-08-29· cited 55×
- In Re DunbarSupreme Court of Vermont· 1994-06-17· cited 50×
- State v. HuntSupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-10-21· cited 48×
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Vermont· 1996-01-12· cited 44×
- State v. PercySupreme Court of Vermont· 1992-05-08· cited 41×
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-09-08· cited 40×
- State v. ValleySupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-12-29· cited 33×
- State v. LongleySupreme Court of Vermont· 2007-10-12· cited 32×
- State v. WeeksSupreme Court of Vermont· 1993-06-18· cited 31×
- F.E.F. v. CameronSupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-05-17· cited 26×
- State v. LaroseSupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-09-02· cited 25×
- State v. DunbarSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-08-25· cited 24×
- State v. ForteSupreme Court of Vermont· 1993-01-29· cited 23×
- State v. GoodrichSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-04-14· cited 19×
- State v. FamigliettiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-08· cited 19×
- State v. LeggettSupreme Court of Vermont· 1998-02-02· cited 16×
- State v. PriorSupreme Court of Vermont· 2002-05-24· cited 16×
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of Vermont· 2008-10-10· cited 15×
Cites
45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 6,537×
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court· 1976-06-17· cited 4,773×
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 2,521×
- United States v. HastingSupreme Court· 1983-05-23· cited 1,999×
- Jenkins v. AndersonSupreme Court· 1980-06-10· cited 1,359×
- Greer v. MillerSupreme Court· 1987-09-21· cited 1,215×
- Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court· 1973-06-11· cited 827×
- Wainwright v. GreenfieldSupreme Court· 1986-01-14· cited 752×
- Fletcher v. WeirSupreme Court· 1982-03-23· cited 749×
- Arizona v. MauroSupreme Court· 1987-06-26· cited 418×
- Sanchez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-03-19· cited 197×
- State v. EspositoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-02-07· cited 159×
- State v. JewettSupreme Court of Vermont· 1985-08-09· cited 142×
- People v. SantarelliNew York Court of Appeals· 1980-01-15· cited 135×
- Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-12-31· cited 121×
- State v. CatsamSupreme Court of Vermont· 1987-08-14· cited 108×
- Krupp v. KruppSupreme Court of Vermont· 1967-12-05· cited 79×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.