Skip to main content

State v. Hazelton

Citations

  • 2009 VT 93
  • 987 A.2d 915
  • 186 Vt. 342
  • 2009 Vt. LEXIS 94

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “expert testimony regarding the profile of young sexual assault victims” is admissible but may not be “tantamount to a direct comment that the complainant [is] telling the truth about the alleged sexual assault” (alteration in original)
  • explaining that “expert testimony regarding the profile of young sexual assault victims” is admissible but may not be “tantamount to a direct comment that the complainant [is] telling the truth about the alleged sexual assault” (alteration in original)
  • explaining that “expert testimony regarding the profile of young sexual assault victims” is admissible but may not be “tantamount to a direct comment that the complainant [is] telling the truth about the alleged sexual assault” (alteration in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reiber, Dooley, Johnson, Skoglund, Burgess

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.