Eighth Circuit· 3/10/1986
United States v. Bruce Bell
Citations
- 785 F.2d 640
- 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 22836
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a lab report on drug test results was admissible without authentication
- concluding that \[t]here was no showing whatever that producing the live testimony of the police officers involved would have presented any significant difficulty\ because \[a]ll of them were within the State of Arkansas\
- holding that the government failed to show that presenting live testimony of officers at revocation hearing in Arkansas would have caused significant difficulty when those officers were also located in Arkansas
- holding that the government failed to show that presenting live testimony of officers at revocation -4- hearing in Arkansas would have caused significant difficulty when those officers were also located in Arkansas
- concluding that admissions which sufficiently corroborate police report support that report s reliability
- concluding that admissions which sufficiently corroborate police report support that report s reliability
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Arnold, Wollman, Gunn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
102 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Cox v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-03-03· cited 320×
- United States v. Woody Hyatt McCormick Jr.Fifth Circuit· 1995-05-24· cited 158×
- United States v. Shauntel Martin, Also Known as BooEighth Circuit· 2004-09-10· cited 101×
- United States v. Daniel Douglas MartinNinth Circuit· 1993-01-21· cited 95×
- People v. ArreolaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1994-07-14· cited 92×
- United States v. Frank GrandlundFifth Circuit· 1996-01-10· cited 90×
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of Vermont· 1996-08-09· cited 85×
- United States v. LloydThird Circuit· 2009-05-27· cited 73×
- United States v. James GrimesEighth Circuit· 1995-05-08· cited 69×
- Jerry Farrish v. Mississippi State Parole BoardFifth Circuit· 1988-02-05· cited 63×
- Curtis E. Crawford v. Patricia A. JacksonD.C. Circuit· 2003-05-01· cited 61×
- United States v. John Curtis KindredFifth Circuit· 1990-11-20· cited 60×
- United States v. Delvonn BattleEighth Circuit· 2014-12-22· cited 58×
- James Reardon v. John R. Manson, Perry Hawkins v. Richard SteinertSecond Circuit· 1986-11-20· cited 52×
- United States v. Timothy Roy ZentgrafEighth Circuit· 1994-04-05· cited 52×
- United States v. JonesTenth Circuit· 2016-04-05· cited 41×
- United States v. Stanfield, David C.D.C. Circuit· 2004-03-19· cited 40×
- United States v. Robert M. WarnerSeventh Circuit· 1987-09-14· cited 37×
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-09-17· cited 33×
- Sherman v. ScottFifth Circuit· 1995-08-30· cited 32×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 10,835×
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
- McCallum v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1982-11-08· cited 113×
- Paul Ivan Birzon, in Behalf of Morris Satz v. Edward S. King, United States Marshal and Hon. Michael A. Amico, Sheriff of Erie CountySecond Circuit· 1972-12-06· cited 97×
- United States v. Edward Eugene PennEleventh Circuit· 1983-12-19· cited 87×
- United States v. Kenneth Lewis McCallum A/K/A Kenneth Louis McCallumFourth Circuit· 1982-06-09· cited 80×
- United States v. Mario BurkhalterEighth Circuit· 1978-12-07· cited 46×
- United States v. Joseph PattmanEighth Circuit· 1976-05-25· cited 28×
Other cases named United States v. Bruce Bell
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.