United States v. Bruce Bell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a lab report on drug test results was admissible without authentication
• concluding that \[t]here was no showing whatever that producing the live testimony of the police officers involved would have presented any significant difficulty\ because \[a]ll of them were within the State of Arkansas\
• holding that the government failed to show that presenting live testimony of officers at revocation hearing in Arkansas would have caused significant difficulty when those officers were also located in Arkansas
• holding that the government failed to show that presenting live testimony of officers at revocation -4- hearing in Arkansas would have caused significant difficulty when those officers were also located in Arkansas
• concluding that admissions which sufficiently corroborate police report support that report s reliability
• concluding that admissions which sufficiently corroborate police report support that report s reliability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).