Skip to main content

State v. Langley

Citations

  • 16 P.3d 489
  • 331 Or. 430
  • 2000 Ore. LEXIS 989

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that counsel’s failure to object waived the defendant’s privacy interest, if any, under the Fourteenth Amendment, as embodied in the psychotherapist-patient privilege
  • “[T]he doctrine of the law of the case is inapplicable in light of new facts or evidence bearing on the legal issue in question.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carson, Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Durham, Leeson, Riggs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.