Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1/9/2002
State v. Becker
Citations
- 178 Or. App. 602
- 37 P.3d 252
- 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 11
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “a defendant’s counsel has full authority to manage the conduct of the trial” and, therefore, “generally may'—without personal endorsement by the defendant on the record—waive rights falling within that province”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brewer, Deits, Landau
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brookhart v. JanisSupreme Court· 1966-04-18· cited 1,130×
- New York v. HillSupreme Court· 2000-01-12· cited 565×
- State v. MeyrickOregon Supreme Court· 1992-04-23· cited 136×
- State v. LotchesOregon Supreme Court· 2000-12-29· cited 125×
- State v. HunterOregon Supreme Court· 1993-05-06· cited 24×
- State v. CordrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-06-15· cited 13×
- State v. GillilandCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-04-20· cited 13×
- State v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court· 2000-12-29· cited 12×
- State v. WaechterCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-10-13· cited 7×
- Hohman v. Royce M.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-06-08· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.