Skip to main content
· 9/3/1986

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Germundson

Citations

  • 724 P.2d 793
  • 301 Or. 656
  • 1986 Ore. LEXIS 1476

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that lawyer’s act of executing promissory note as representative of corporation when lawyer knew he had no authority to act on behalf of that corporation violated DR 1-102(A)(3)
  • holding that lawyer's act of executing promissory note as representative of corporation when lawyer knew he had no authority to act on behalf of that corporation violated DR 1-102(A)(3)
  • lawyer who signed promissory notes on behalf of a corporation in which he had an interest, without authority to do so, violated DR 1-102(A)(3)
  • attorney borrowed from client, which might reasonably affect his judgment in subsequent professional tasks for client
  • numerous client loans to attorney or businesses in which attorney had an interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.