· 9/3/1986
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Germundson
Citations
- 724 P.2d 793
- 301 Or. 656
- 1986 Ore. LEXIS 1476
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that lawyer’s act of executing promissory note as representative of corporation when lawyer knew he had no authority to act on behalf of that corporation violated DR 1-102(A)(3)
- holding that lawyer's act of executing promissory note as representative of corporation when lawyer knew he had no authority to act on behalf of that corporation violated DR 1-102(A)(3)
- lawyer who signed promissory notes on behalf of a corporation in which he had an interest, without authority to do so, violated DR 1-102(A)(3)
- attorney borrowed from client, which might reasonably affect his judgment in subsequent professional tasks for client
- numerous client loans to attorney or businesses in which attorney had an interest
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.