State v. Kindred

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the text and history of the statute “shows that the legislature intended that set aside convictions would pre- clude defendants from having their motions granted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Singleton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-01-12· cited 5×
• State v. Sylva
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-09-22· cited 4×
• State v. Grant
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-04-09· cited 3×
• State v. Singleton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-01-02

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Gaines
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-04-30· cited 1,741×
• Gaona v. BLACKETTER
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2008-09-12· cited 60×
• State v. Langan
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1986-04-22· cited 35×
• State v. Branam
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-05-28· cited 15×
• Fenimore v. Blachly-Lane Cnty. C.E.A.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-04-10· cited 11×
• State v. Phillips
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2021-03-04· cited 9×
• Patterson v. Foote
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-02-25· cited 5×
• State v. Bomar
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-05-21· cited 4×
• State v. J. N. L.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-02-04· cited 2×