State v. Stanford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court does not decide if preclusion doctrines can be applied against a defendant in a criminal proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Beaver v. John Q. Hammons Hotels, L.P.
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2003-12-11· cited 22×
• Supernova Media, Inc. v. Shannon's Rainbow, LLC
  Utah Supreme Court· 2013-02-15· cited 21×
• Norris v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-01-07· cited 8×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Drews v. EBI Companies
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1990-07-11· cited 214×
• State v. Langan
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1986-04-22· cited 35×
• Gentry v. Pacific Livestock Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1904-06-20· cited 21×
• State v. Stanford
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-01-31· cited 9×
• Stowell v. R.L.K. & Co.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-01-18· cited 6×