Court of Appeals of Oregon· 5/28/2008
State v. Branam
Citations
- 185 P.3d 557
- 220 Or. App. 255
- 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 731
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The fact that the legislature used the definite article ‘the’ and the singular form of the noun ‘sentence’ suggests that it intended the requirements in ORS 137.225(l)(a) to apply to only one particular sentence.”
- “The fact that the legislature used the definite article ‘the’ and the singular form of the noun ‘sentence’ suggests that it intended the requirements in ORS 137.225(l)(a) to apply to only one particular sentence.”
- “The fact that the legislature used the definite article ‘the’ and the singular form of the noun ‘sentence’ suggests that it intended the requirements in ORS 137.225(l)(a) to apply to only one particular sentence.”
- statutory reference to “the sentence” construed to mean “only one particular sentence”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Armstrong, Ortega
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. Lopez-MinjarezCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-07-28· cited 15×
- State v. Long-EllisCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-01-31· cited 5×
- State v. KindredCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-09-09· cited 5×
- State v. RowlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-08-31· cited 4×
- Carrillo v. City of StanfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-02-23· cited 4×
- State v. SylvaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-09-22· cited 4×
- Pamplin Media Grp. v. City of SalemCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-09-06· cited 3×
- State v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-01-02· cited 3×
- Bowerman v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-08-23· cited 2×
- Protect Grand Island Farms v. Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-04-04· cited 1×
- S. Valley Bank & Trust v. Colo. Dutch, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-04-04· cited 1×
- State v. Thoai Dinh VuCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-04-29· cited 1×
- State v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-06-05· cited 1×
- State v. VuCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-04-29
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court· 1993-10-19· cited 2,400×
- Roop v. PARKER NORTHWEST PAVING, CO.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-07-21· cited 54×
- State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-12-19· cited 46×
- State v. McDonnellOregon Supreme Court· 2007-12-20· cited 38×
- State v. LanganOregon Supreme Court· 1986-04-22· cited 35×
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-06-10· cited 34×
- Godfrey v. Fred Meyer StoresCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-11-23· cited 21×
- State v. HoffmeisterCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-11-24· cited 18×
- State v. BolfCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-02-06· cited 11×
- Klamath County School District v. TeameyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-08-02· cited 9×
- State v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-06-20· cited 8×
- State v. BowmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-04-21· cited 6×
- State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-05-02· cited 6×
- State v. LucasCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-05-13· cited 4×
- State v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-07-07· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.