Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 12/17/2001

State v. Lambert

Citations

147 N.H. 295
787 A.2d 175
2001 N.H. LEXIS 214

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that we refer to abuse of discretion standard as the unsustainable exercise of discretion standard
explaining that we refer to abuse of discretion standard as the unsustainable exercise of discretion standard
explaining that we now refer to abuse of discretion standard as unsustainable exercise of discretion standard
explaining that we refer to the abuse of discretion standard as the unsustainable exercise of discretion standard and describing the requirements of that standard
“Because the ‘abuse of discretion’ standard may carry an inaccurate connotation, we will hereafter refer to it as the ‘unsustainable exercise of discretion’ standard.”
to establish that trial court’s decision is unsustainable defendant must demonstrate that ruling was clearly untenable or unreasonable to the prejudice of his case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brock, Broderick, Dalianis, Nadeau

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

245 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named State v. Lambert

128 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.