Court of Appeals of Oregon· 7/25/2018
State v. Meeker
Citations
- 427 P.3d 1114
- 293 Or. App. 82
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to “resolve the parties’ dispute regarding the applicability of the officer safety doctrine to mere conversation encounters”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Devore, Garrett, Powers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. VanornumOregon Supreme Court· 2013-12-27· cited 546×
- State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court· 1987-12-22· cited 243×
- State v. AshbaughOregon Supreme Court· 2010-12-09· cited 161×
- State v. Maciel-FigueroaOregon Supreme Court· 2017-03-02· cited 137×
- State v. Rodriguez-PerezCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-04-09· cited 29×
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-10-22· cited 25×
- State v. MesserCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-12-19· cited 24×
- State v. AmellCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-08-12· cited 17×
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-12-07· cited 14×
- State v. RuizCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-12-01· cited 10×
- State v. LambertCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-10-01· cited 10×
- State v. RudnitskyyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-10-29· cited 10×
- State v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-08-12· cited 7×
- State v. LambertCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-06-18· cited 6×
- State v. ShawOregon Supreme Court· 2009-12-09· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.