State v. Korth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• actual knowledge that truck was stolen not inferable from the facts that the defendant was driving it, possessed jiggle key, and gave an implausible story about having borrowed the truck
• not- ing that, while circumstances would allow for finding that the defendant had knowledge of some wrongdoing, it would not allow for the more specific finding that the defendant knew that the truck he possessed was stolen

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Peirce
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-04-03· cited 9×
• State v. Connelly
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-06-19· cited 9×
• State v. Witt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-07-21· cited 4×
• State v. Buell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-10-13· cited 1×
• State v. Guillen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-10-29· cited 1×
• State v. Mull
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-07-08

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Bivins
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-01-21· cited 172×
• State v. Cervantes
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-05-26· cited 131×
• Delgado v. Souders
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2002-05-16· cited 82×
• State v. Bell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-05-28· cited 22×
• State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Hal
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-05-31· cited 14×
• State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Mitchell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-07-03· cited 13×
• State v. Shuneson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-01-04· cited 13×
• State v. Shipe
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-07-23· cited 10×