State v. Connelly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The state may prove a defendant’s knowledge with circumstan- tial evidence and reasonable inferences flowing from that evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Leake
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-03-29· cited 10×
• State v. Modrzejewski
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-05-26· cited 5×
• Boswell v. State of Oregon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-07-15· cited 4×
• State v. Witt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-07-21· cited 4×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-02-26· cited 3×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Bivins
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-01-21· cited 172×
• State v. Lupoli
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2010-06-04· cited 104×
• State v. Bell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-05-28· cited 22×
• State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Hal
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-05-31· cited 14×
• State v. Shuneson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-01-04· cited 13×
• State v. Gibson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-01-07· cited 13×
• State v. Shipe
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-07-23· cited 10×
• State v. Peirce
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-04-03· cited 9×
• State v. Korth
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-02-19· cited 7×