Court of Appeals of Oregon· 7/3/1996
State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Mitchell
Citations
- 920 P.2d 1103
- 142 Or. App. 40
- 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 823
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, even though the vehicle’s locks had been punched and the ignition area damaged, there was no evidence that the defendant (a passenger) had noticed those issues
- reversing juvenile court jurisdiction where the evidence was not sufficient to support a finding that, beyond a reasonable doubt, the child knew that the vehicle in which he had ridden was stolen
- “A person charged with unauthorized use must know that the vehicle was stolen at the time the person was a passenger.”
- evidence of damage to door locks and ignition was not sufficient to prove “knowledge” element of UUV charge when there was no evidence that the damage was obvious or that the passenger had noticed it
- evidence of damage to door locks and ignition was not sufficient to prove “knowledge” element of UUV charge against a passenger when there was no evidence that the damage was obvious or that the passenger had noticed it
- insufficient evidence to estab- lish the youth’s knowledge that the vehicle he was riding in was stolen, despite the fact that the vehicle’s door locks were punched and the ignition was damaged, because there was no evidence that the youth perceived that damage
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Deits, De Muniz Haselton, De Muniz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BellCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-05-28· cited 22×
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. HalCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-05-31· cited 14×
- State v. RayburnCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-11-09· cited 12×
- State v. ShipeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-07-23· cited 10×
- State v. LaskyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-11-14· cited 8×
- State v. KorthCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-02-19· cited 7×
- State v. AyvazovCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-11-23· cited 6×
- State v. WittCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-07-21· cited 4×
- State v. SimonovCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-03-18· cited 3×
- State v. GuillenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-10-29· cited 1×
- Oregon Occupational Safety & Health Division v. Reno Drain Oil ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-09-22
- State v. B. B. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-02-24
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Other cases named State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Mitchell
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.