Skip to main content

State v. Bell

Citations

  • 185 P.3d 541
  • 220 Or. App. 266
  • 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 730

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the state was required to prove that the defendant actually knew the car was stolen because the state charged him with UUV with a knowing mental state
  • An inferred fact “must be one that a rational factfinder can be convinced follows beyond a rea- sonable doubt from the underlying facts.”
  • knowledge that a vehicle is stolen cannot be inferred from the fact that the person from whom the defendant “rented” the vehicle was a stranger who approached him on the street and offered to rent him the vehicle for $50
  • equating “without consent of owner” and “stolen”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Landau, Schuman, Riggs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.