Court of Appeals of Oregon· 5/28/2008
State v. Bell
Citations
- 185 P.3d 541
- 220 Or. App. 266
- 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 730
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the state was required to prove that the defendant actually knew the car was stolen because the state charged him with UUV with a knowing mental state
- An inferred fact “must be one that a rational factfinder can be convinced follows beyond a rea- sonable doubt from the underlying facts.”
- knowledge that a vehicle is stolen cannot be inferred from the fact that the person from whom the defendant “rented” the vehicle was a stranger who approached him on the street and offered to rent him the vehicle for $50
- equating “without consent of owner” and “stolen”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Schuman, Riggs
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-11-12· cited 29×
- State v. WierCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-12-26· cited 13×
- State v. RayburnCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-11-09· cited 12×
- State v. ShipeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-07-23· cited 10×
- State v. PeirceCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-04-03· cited 9×
- State v. ConnellyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-06-19· cited 9×
- State v. LaskyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-11-14· cited 8×
- State v. KorthCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-02-19· cited 7×
- State v. PusztaiCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-03-18· cited 5×
- State v. KulickCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-09-22· cited 5×
- State v. WittCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-07-21· cited 4×
- State v. FitchCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-10-23· cited 4×
- State v. SimonovCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-03-18· cited 3×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-02-26· cited 3×
- State v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-11-27· cited 2×
- State v. OdnealCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-07-29· cited 1×
- State v. GuillenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-10-29· cited 1×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. CunninghamOregon Supreme Court· 1994-09-09· cited 277×
- State v. BivinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-01-21· cited 172×
- Delgado v. SoudersOregon Supreme Court· 2002-05-16· cited 82×
- State v. LaneOregon Supreme Court· 2006-10-05· cited 14×
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. HalCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-05-31· cited 14×
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-07-03· cited 13×
- State v. ShunesonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-01-04· cited 13×
- State v. JOST/OREGON-WASHINGTON RECOVERY CO.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-08-25· cited 3×
- State v. NuzmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-08-04· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.