Court of Appeals of Oregon· 4/3/2019

State v. Peirce

Citations

440 P.3d 98
296 Or. App. 829

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that, in a sale of a stolen vehicle, evidence of, among other things a “very cheap price,” damage to the ignition, and inconsistent statements, was enough together to allow a factfinder to infer the defendant’s knowledge that the vehicle was stolen
concluding that, in a sale of a stolen vehicle, evidence of, among other things a “very cheap price,” damage to the ignition, and inconsistent statements, was enough together to allow a factfinder to infer the defendant’s knowledge that the vehicle was stolen
conclud- ing that, in a sale of a stolen vehicle, evidence of a “very cheap price,” damage to the ignition, and a suspicious bill of sale, among other things, was enough together to allow a factfinder to infer the defendant’s knowledge that the vehicle was stolen
conclud- ing that, in a sale of a stolen vehicle, evidence of a “very cheap price,” damage to the ignition, and a suspicious bill of sale, among other things, was enough together to allow a factfinder to infer the defendant’s knowledge that the vehicle was stolen

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Shorr, Tookey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.