Skip to main content

State v. Ellis

Citations

  • 547 S.E.2d 490
  • 345 S.C. 175
  • 2001 S.C. LEXIS 91

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that when a criminal statute specifically lists covered locations, those not mentioned are excluded
  • clarifying that while police officer may testify as expert in crime scene processing and fingerprint identification, he may not testify to ultimate issue as to whether defendant acted in self-defense
  • reversing and remanding appellant's sentence and conviction because \an unqualified witness was permitted to offer an expert opinion on the ultimate issue\
  • explaining improper testimony that went to the heart of the case was not harmless
  • finding police officer, who was qualified as an expert in crime scene processing and fingerprint identification, exceeded the scope of his expertise when he was permitted to testify to conclusions drawn from the location and position of the victim's body at the time of the shooting
  • finding police officer, who was qualified as an expert in crime scene processing and fingerprint identification, exceeded the scope of his expertise when he was permitted to testify to conclusions drawn from the location and position of the victim’s body at the time of the shooting

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pleicones, Toal, Moore, Waller, Burnett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.