Supreme Court of South Carolina· 5/29/2001
State v. Ellis
Citations
- 547 S.E.2d 490
- 345 S.C. 175
- 2001 S.C. LEXIS 91
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that when a criminal statute specifically lists covered locations, those not mentioned are excluded
- clarifying that while police officer may testify as expert in crime scene processing and fingerprint identification, he may not testify to ultimate issue as to whether defendant acted in self-defense
- reversing and remanding appellant's sentence and conviction because \an unqualified witness was permitted to offer an expert opinion on the ultimate issue\
- explaining improper testimony that went to the heart of the case was not harmless
- finding police officer, who was qualified as an expert in crime scene processing and fingerprint identification, exceeded the scope of his expertise when he was permitted to testify to conclusions drawn from the location and position of the victim's body at the time of the shooting
- finding police officer, who was qualified as an expert in crime scene processing and fingerprint identification, exceeded the scope of his expertise when he was permitted to testify to conclusions drawn from the location and position of the victim’s body at the time of the shooting
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pleicones, Toal, Moore, Waller, Burnett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. JenningsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-09-19· cited 122×
- State v. CommanderSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-10-31· cited 51×
- State v. DouglasSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-01-12· cited 48×
- State v. TappSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-06-06· cited 45×
- State v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-01-23· cited 33×
- State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-01-16· cited 19×
- State v. StandardSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-08-12· cited 16×
- Risher v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-06-20· cited 13×
- State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2015-03-11· cited 12×
- Nelson v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-09-17· cited 9×
- Hamrick v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2019-05-15· cited 9×
- State v. HuckabeeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2017-03-15· cited 8×
- In re the Care & Treatment of Thomas S.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-04-10· cited 3×
- Mangal v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2015-12-30· cited 3×
- URIAS (BRANDON) v. DIST. CT. (STATE) (CRIMINAL)Nevada Supreme Court· 2025-05-08· cited 3×
- State v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-07-18· cited 2×
- State v. WestmorelandCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2017-07-12· cited 2×
- Risher v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPT. OF HEALTHSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-06-20
- State v. PratherSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2020-03-11
- State v. Zantravious Randell HallCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2022-06-01
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hopt v. UtahSupreme Court· 1887-03-07· cited 330×
- State v. Von DohlenSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-05-28· cited 85×
- Fordham v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1985-02-15· cited 52×
- State v. KingSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-03-08· cited 49×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-01-08· cited 44×
- State v. SullivanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1895-02-20· cited 13×
- State v. GilchristSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-08-21· cited 11×
- State v. WilkinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1991-08-05· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.