Skip to main content

State v. King

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 1365

Syllabus

Crim.R. 11; guilty plea; knowing, intelligent, voluntary; R.C. 2929.14; consecutive sentences. Appellant's guilty pleas were knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily made. The trial court partially complied with Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(a) and (b), and the appellant failed to demonstrate prejudice. The trial court's imposition of consecutive sentences was pursuant to law.

Judges: Laster Mays

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.