State v. Hindman
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 1974
Syllabus
Plea sex-offender classification maximum penalty prejudice requirement. A classification as a sex offender is a penalty for the purposes of Crim.R. 11. The trial court's failure to give the defendant any advisement whatsoever that his guilty plea to sexual battery would result in him being classified as a sex offender constitutes a complete failure to advise the defendant of the maximum penalty. Because the trial court completely failed to comply with a portion of Crim.R. 11(C), the defendant was relieved of his burden of showing prejudice. The defendant's plea therefore must be vacated.
Judges: Ryan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. StewartOhio Supreme Court· 1977-07-13· cited 788×
- State v. EngleOhio Supreme Court· 1996-02-14· cited 784×
- State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court· 2004-02-11· cited 410×
- State v. Dangler (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-05-05· cited 408×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 2011-07-13· cited 406×
- State v. SarkozyOhio Supreme Court· 2008-02-14· cited 403×
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-02-14· cited 5×
- State v. BakerOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-01-16· cited 5×
- State v. DornoffOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-07-31· cited 5×
- State v. FisherOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-05-06· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.