State v. Sheline
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 528
Syllabus
Murder aggravated arson motion in limine other acts evidence due process fair trial abuse of discretion Evid.R. 404(B) identity modus operandi harmless error Crim.R. 52(A) sufficiency Crim.R. 29 circumstantial evidence serious physical harm manifest weight hearsay Evid.R. 801 Evid.R. 802 authentication Evid.R. 901 right to confrontation video testimony motion to dismiss speedy trial R.C. 2945.71 tolling R.C. 2945.72 preindictment delay motion for a mistrial Brady violation exculpatory evidence Crim.R. 16 consecutive sentences R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) R.C. 2953.08. Appellant's convictions for murder and aggravated arson and the trial court's sentence are affirmed. The trial court did not err by denying appellant's motion in limine, and appellant's rights to due process and a fair trial were not violated by the trial court's admission of other acts evidence. Appellant's convictions were supported by sufficient evidence and not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court did not err by admitting evidence that was not properly authenticated or inadmissable hearsay. The trial court did not err in permitting a state's witness to testify remotely, and appellant's constitutional right to confront the state's witness was not violated. The trial court did not err by denying defense counsel's motions to dismiss or motions for a mistrial. The trial court did not err in imposing consecutive sentences.
Judges: Celebrezze
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.