State v. Kilby

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding we freely review the application of constitutional principles to the facts as found
• finding no lasting impact where prospective juror called defendant a pedophile
• consent was not invalid where the officer told the defendant that if he refused to consent, the officer would have to obtain a search warrant
• noting jury is presumed to follow court’s instructions
• presuming jury 8 followed jury instructions
• presuming jury followed district court’s instruction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).