Supreme Court of Minnesota· 9/28/2006

State v. Gomez

Citations

721 N.W.2d 871
2006 Minn. LEXIS 673
2006 WL 2773256

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that we must be “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made” to find clear error
stating that substantial rights are affected if “there is a reasonable likelihood that giving the instruction in question had a significant effect on the jury verdict”
examining the prejudice prong in the context of an erroneously included jury instruction
stating it is not the reviewing court’s role to reconcile conflicting evidence
“Given the totality of the evidence, it seems unlikely that the jury would have reached a different verdict.”
“Given the totality of the evidence, it seems unlikely that the jury would have reached a different verdict.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Page

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.