Supreme Court of Minnesota· 8/28/1997

State v. Johnson

Citations

568 N.W.2d 426
1997 Minn. LEXIS 636
1997 WL 527917

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the foundational requirements for reverse- Spreigl evidence are the same as for traditional Spreigl evidence
holding that the foundational requirements for reverse- Spreigl evidence are the same as for traditional Spreigl evidence
“The credibility of individual witnesses and the weight to be given to each witness’ testimony are issues for the jury to determine.”
“It is a well-established rule that a conviction can rest upon the testimony of a single credible witness.”
“[A] jury, as the sole judge of credibility, is free to accept part and reject part of a witness’ testimony.” (quotation omitted)
“In keeping with our standard of review, while the case at bar is close, we will not supplant our judgment for a reasonable exercise of the district court’s discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Gardebring, Tomljanovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.