Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 6/2/1997

State v. Burton

Citations

486 S.E.2d 762
326 S.C. 605
1997 S.C. App. LEXIS 65

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that a ruling during an in camera hearing still requires losing party to renew his or her objection at trial when the evidence is presented in order to preserve the issue for appeal
explaining that the failure to object at the time the evidence is offered constitutes a waiver of the right to have the issue considered on appeal
noting an in limine ruling is not final and does not preserve the issue for appeal
finding in camera admissibility ruling insufficient to preserve issue for appeal where testimony from two witnesses was presented, a break was taken after the ruling and before the testimony at issue was presented, and defendant failed to contemporaneously object
in absence of appropriate Rule 404(b) objection in trial court nothing is preserved for appellate review
in absence of appropriate Rule 404(b) objection in trial court nothing is preserved for appellate review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Howell, Goolsby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.