State v. Jury

Citations

• 203 N.E.3d 222
• 2022 Ohio 4419

Syllabus

State did not violate appellant's due process rights or Brady by failing to obtain data from wireless carriers that are not state agents. Trial court lacked jurisdiction to hear appellant's successive postconviction relief petition appellant did not present new evidence or show that he was unavoidably prevented from discovering the facts he relied on. Trial court could not construe Crim.R. 33(B) motion as postconviction relief petition, but correctly denied appellant leave to file for a new trial.