Skip to main content

State v. Jury

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 6049

Syllabus

In a postconviction proceeding, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying appellant's claims as barred by res judicata. Further, appellant's R.C. 2953.74 application for DNA testing was deficient. Crim.R. 33; Crim.R. 48.

Judges: Sulek

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.