Skip to main content

State v. Marcum

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 4058

Syllabus

The trial court erred in concluding that appellant's petition for postconviction relief was untimely. The trial court did not err in setting a submission schedule and permitting the State to respond to the petition. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in concluding, without a hearing, that appellant did not demonstrate a Brady violation. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Epley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.