Ohio Court of Appeals· 8/30/2024
State v. Jury
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 3342
Syllabus
Duhart. Affirming judgment denying (1) motion for leave to file a delayed motion for a new trial pursuant to Crim.R. 33(B), (2) motion for appointment of counsel, and (3) motion for an extension of time pursuant to Crim.R. 33(A)(6) and/or (B).
Judges: Duhart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-03· cited 2,571×
- Nolan v. NolanOhio Supreme Court· 1984-05-02· cited 893×
- State v. ColeOhio Supreme Court· 1982-12-29· cited 797×
- State v. BlantonOhio Supreme Court· 2022-11-10· cited 86×
- State v. RobertsOhio Court of Appeals· 2001-03-23· cited 18×
- State v. BridgesOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-10-13· cited 18×
- State v. HilerOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-09-15· cited 16×
- State v. SandovalOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-11-07· cited 12×
- State v. JuryOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-12-09· cited 12×
- State v. QuinnOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-12-28· cited 7×
- State v. ClydeOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-02-01· cited 6×
- State v. G.F.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-09-12· cited 6×
- State v. SevillaOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-05-23· cited 5×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-21· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.