State v. Parsons
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 4626
Syllabus
Motion For Leave For A New Trial; Crim.R. 33; Unavoidably Prevented: Brady v. Maryland. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by partially denying the defendant-appellant's motion for leave to file a motion for a new trial because the defendant-appellant did not carry his burden of demonstrating a Brady violation. Therefore, the defendant-appellant was not unavoidably prevented from discovering the new evidence.
Judges: Zimmerman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 6,537×
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court· 1995-04-19· cited 6,003×
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court· 1999-06-17· cited 4,383×
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court· 1980-05-07· cited 3,804×
- Smith v. CainSupreme Court· 2012-01-10· cited 417×
- State v. KettererOhio Supreme Court· 2010-08-25· cited 314×
- State v. HannaOhio Supreme Court· 2002-05-22· cited 176×
- State v. Bethel (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-03-22· cited 161×
- State v. LawsonOhio Supreme Court· 1992-08-12· cited 140×
- State v. McGuireOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-04-12· cited 14×
- State v. KeithOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-01-31· cited 13×
- State v. JuryOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-12-09· cited 12×
- State v. DodsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-07· cited 8×
- State v. HillOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-06-13· cited 4×
- State v. BinghamOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-07-29· cited 2×
- State v. ColeyOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-12-08· cited 1×
- State v. DuncanOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-11-26· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.