Skip to main content

State v. Scott

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 3296

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in denying appellant's successive petition for postconviction relief under R.C. 2953.23, as the matters raised in the petition had been previously litigated and were barred by res judicata. Although the trial court did not rule on appellant's motion for leave to file a motion for a new trial, any error was harmless, as the claims raised in the motion were also barred by res judicata. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Hanseman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.