Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 8/18/1997

State v. Joseph

Citations

491 S.E.2d 275
328 S.C. 352
1997 S.C. App. LEXIS 111

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that the PTI Act \does not extend the same protection to the conduct giving rise to the arrest . . . it does not provide that [the witness] may deny the conduct leading up to the arrest\
explaining discrepancies in testimony reflect upon the credibility of contested evidence, not its admissibility
stating proof of the chain need not negate all possibility of tampering
impeached witness not permitted to explain circumstances surrounding criminal conviction in order to mitigate its impact
\A party offering into evidence fungible items such as drugs . . . must establish a chain of custody as far as practicable.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howell, Howard, Huff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.