Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 11/24/2010
State v. Geer
Citations
- 705 S.E.2d 441
- 391 S.C. 179
- 2010 S.C. App. LEXIS 244
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating an issue may not be raised for the first time in a post-trial motion
- \[R]eversals of refusal of continuance are about as rare as the proverbial hens' teeth.\ (alteration by court
- \An abuse of discretion arises from an error of law or a factual conclusion that is without evidentiary support.\ (quoting State v. Irick, 344 S.C. 460, 464, 545 S.E.2d 282, 284 (2001))
- \An abuse of discretion arises from an error of law or a factual conclusion that is without evidentiary support.\ (quoting State v. Irick, 344 S.C. 460, 464, 545 S.E.2d 282, 284 (2001))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Geathers, Konduros, Lockemy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. MeggettCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-06-27· cited 18×
- Keene v. CNA Holdings, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2019-02-13· cited 9×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-08-15· cited 5×
- State v. GalimoreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-01-25· cited 3×
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2020-08-05
- George Moses v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2024-01-03
Cites
39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-10-10· cited 6,013×
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court· 1886-05-10· cited 3,789×
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court· 1983-04-19· cited 3,147×
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court· 1978-03-06· cited 2,683×
- United States v. ArmstrongSupreme Court· 1996-05-13· cited 1,801×
- Wayte v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1985-03-19· cited 1,692×
- United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court· 1982-06-18· cited 1,581×
- United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court· 1926-10-11· cited 1,033×
- Wilder Corp. v. WilkeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-03-09· cited 665×
- State v. DunbarSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-10-13· cited 513×
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-04-23· cited 334×
- State v. BaccusSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-01-09· cited 298×
- State v. GasterSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-05-20· cited 178×
- South Carolina Department of Transportation v. First Carolina Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-02-27· cited 147×
- United States v. Smith Grading and Paving, Inc. And Herbert P. Lee, Iii, United States of America v. Dellinger, Inc. And Theodore C. DellingerFourth Circuit· 1985-04-22· cited 139×
- United States v. Richard Ralston CatlettEighth Circuit· 1978-10-12· cited 87×
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-11-23· cited 71×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.