Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 7/27/1998
State v. Colf
Citations
- 504 S.E.2d 360
- 332 S.C. 313
- 1998 S.C. App. LEXIS 103
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an issue is deemed abandoned if argument in brief is merely conclusory
- holding a conclusory, two-paragraph argument that cited no authority other than an evidentiary rule was deemed abandoned on appeal
- finding a conclusory, two-paragraph argument that cited no 1 See S.C. Code § 33-31-620(a) (2006). authority other than an evidentiary rule was abandoned
- finding a conclusory, two-paragraph argument that cited no authority other than an evidentiary rule was abandoned
- finding a conclusory, two-paragraph argument that cited no authority other than an evidentiary rule was abandoned
- finding a conclusory, two-paragraph argument that cited no authority other than an evidentiary rule was abandoned
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cureton, Howell, Goolsby
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. ColfSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-01-04· cited 78×
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-03-25· cited 52×
- State v. DunlapCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-07-02· cited 22×
- Laffitte v. Bridgestone Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-03-02· cited 22×
- State v. SierraCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-10-04· cited 11×
- Hunter v. StaplesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-03-15· cited 10×
- State v. AddisonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-12-06· cited 9×
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-04-20· cited 8×
- Dawkins v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-02-26· cited 4×
- Hhhunt Corp. v. Town of LexingtonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-08-25· cited 2×
- State v. MizzellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-06-26· cited 1×
- State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2020-09-16
- State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2020-10-07
- John Deere Construction & Forestry Company v. North Edisto Logging, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2024-07-03
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- First Savings Bank v. McLeanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-05-23· cited 206×
- United States v. Luther Amos BeahmFourth Circuit· 1981-11-18· cited 136×
- United States v. Edward M. GilbertSecond Circuit· 1982-01-29· cited 115×
- United States v. Lester Sloman (89-4056), Paul Bauer (89-4057)Sixth Circuit· 1990-07-27· cited 115×
- United States v. Frank W. CatheyFifth Circuit· 1979-03-02· cited 105×
- United States v. Jamie Barrera Lopez, Eugenio Ozuna Ramirez, Jr., Eliseo De La Garza, and Robert San-Martin DelgadoFifth Circuit· 1993-01-11· cited 100×
- State v. SimsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-09-24· cited 97×
- United States v. Charles S. Brown, Jr.Eighth Circuit· 1992-02-07· cited 81×
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert MURRAY, James Moore, and Susan Watson, Defendants-AppellantsNinth Circuit· 1985-01-22· cited 74×
- United States v. John T. BrownFirst Circuit· 1979-08-08· cited 67×
- State v. SherardSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-01-07· cited 61×
- State v. HugginsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-01-20· cited 38×
- State v. VaughnSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-02-03· cited 33×
- Solomon v. CITY REALTY COMPANYSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1974-02-20· cited 27×
- State v. JosephCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-08-18· cited 22×
- Roberts v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1987-03-30· cited 12×
- State v. ShawCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-09-29· cited 10×
- American Home Assurance Company v. American President Lines, Ltd.Ninth Circuit· 1994-12-30· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.