State v. Chisolm

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding drug evidence inadmissible where “it would not have been impracticable for the State to have called each custodian to testify or for the State to have submitted sworn statements from the custodians under ... Rule 6(b), SCRCrimP.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Sweet
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-06-11· cited 46×
• State v. Hatcher
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-03-21· cited 41×
• State v. Taylor
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-06-24· cited 23×
• State v. Walton
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-10-11· cited 2×
• State v. Hatcher
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-08-05· cited 1×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Bailey
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-03-13· cited 177×
• State v. McHoney
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-03-19· cited 100×
• State v. Burdette
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-04-05· cited 87×
• Brown v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-01-08· cited 44×
• State v. Cribb
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-12-14· cited 34×
• State v. Carter
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-03-26· cited 30×
• State v. Miller
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-11-10· cited 28×
• State v. Joseph
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-08-18· cited 22×
• State v. McGowan
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-12-17· cited 16×