Supreme Court of South Carolina· 3/6/1989
State v. Jones
Citations
- 298 S.C. 118
- 378 S.E.2d 594
- 1989 S.C. LEXIS 57
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- no abuse of discretion in denial of admission of photograph where photo was cumulative to other photographs admitted into evidence
- no abuse of discretion in denial of admission of photograph where photo was cumulative to other photographs admitted into evidence
- a prospective juror is not disqualified merely because he is a friend or acquaintance of a murder victim
- “The mere fact that a person is a friend or acquaintance of the deceased does not render him incompetent as a juror.”
- exclusion of evidence harmless where cumulative
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chandler, Finney, Gregory, Harwell, Toal
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. TorrenceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-05-20· cited 352×
- State v. GeorgeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-09-03· cited 98×
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-03-19· cited 89×
- Elmore v. OzmintFourth Circuit· 2011-11-22· cited 71×
- State v. HicksSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-04-27· cited 60×
- State v. BellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-06-24· cited 48×
- State v. HugginsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-01-20· cited 38×
- State v. LongworthSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-10-25· cited 31×
- Burke v. AnMed HealthCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-04-27· cited 30×
- State v. JosephCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-08-18· cited 22×
- State v. ShaferSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-05-08· cited 22×
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-08-31· cited 19×
- State v. NewellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1991-01-07· cited 17×
- State v. TruesdaleSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-03-12· cited 15×
- State v. ElkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-10-04· cited 14×
- State v. WilkinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1992-12-07· cited 12×
- State v. BurgessCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-12-15· cited 12×
- Edward Elmore v. Jon OzmintFourth Circuit· 2012-12-12
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-08-14
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-03-06
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Skipper v. South CarolinaSupreme Court· 1986-04-29· cited 1,534×
- California v. BrownSupreme Court· 1987-01-27· cited 1,207×
- State v. CopelandSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-11-10· cited 134×
- Goodman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-10-02· cited 108×
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-10-06· cited 90×
- State v. PlathSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1984-01-17· cited 85×
- State v. OwensSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-07-06· cited 61×
- State v. DraytonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-09-08· cited 61×
- State v. GaskinsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-01-22· cited 58×
- State v. GilbertSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-09-14· cited 54×
- State v. GardnerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1951-03-19· cited 52×
- State v. YatesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-12-22· cited 50×
- State v. SouthSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-06-04· cited 48×
- State v. AtkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-08-24· cited 45×
- State v. PatrickSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-06-09· cited 42×
- State v. MiddletonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-02-22· cited 41×
- State v. SpannSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-10-13· cited 41×
- State v. MatthewsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-10-24· cited 40×
- State v. ToddSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-10-06· cited 36×
- State v. WoomerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-12-20· cited 36×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.