Skip to main content

State v. Barrett

Citations

  • 694 N.W.2d 783
  • 2005 Minn. LEXIS 209
  • 2005 WL 913507

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the State’s pretrial appeal may be dismissed if the State “fails to timely file and serve its brief’
  • holding “that the court of appeals does not have jurisdiction over a pretrial prosecution appeal if the prosecuting attorney has failed to serve the notice of appeal upon the State Public Defender”
  • noting failure to serve SPDO may deprive indigent defendant of representation on appeal
  • “[ejxcept for the timely filing of the notice of appeal, a party’s failure to comply with the appellate rules does not affect the validity of the appeal” [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • “Because jurisdiction is a question of law, our standard of review is de novo.”
  • discussing appeal of pre-trial issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.