Supreme Court of Minnesota· 7/3/1980
State v. Aguirre
Citations
- 295 N.W.2d 79
- 1980 Minn. LEXIS 1487
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “the constitutional prerequisite to the warrantless nonconsensual removal of blood of a conscious or unconscious driver” is “probable cause plus exigent circumstances”
- finding it was \essential\ the officer obtain the blood sample without regard to whether the defendant would consent to the blood draw
- finding it was “essential” the officer obtain the blood sample without regard to whether the defendant would consent to the blood draw
- interpreting Minn. Stat. § 169.121 , subd. 2 (1978) 1
- “[T]he constitutional prerequisite to the warrantless nonconsensual removal of blood of a conscious or unconscious driver is the same: probable cause plus exigent circumstances.”
- nonconsensual blood test may be taken if officer has probable cause to believe driver committed CVO
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sheran
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. Joon Kyu KimSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1987-01-02· cited 179×
- People v. SutherlandSupreme Court of Colorado· 1984-06-04· cited 101×
- State v. ShrinerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-05-30· cited 85×
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-10-29· cited 46×
- State v. EntrekinHawaii Supreme Court· 2002-06-05· cited 43×
- State v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-01-18· cited 40×
- State v. SpeakSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-11-04· cited 34×
- Tyler v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-05-24· cited 34×
- State of Minnesota v. Derek Lawrence StavishSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2015-08-19· cited 27×
- State v. WaicelunasCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-08-02· cited 23×
- People v. TrotmanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1989-09-28· cited 19×
- State v. CormierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2007-08-14· cited 16×
- United States v. PondU S Air Force Court of Military Review· 1993-02-25· cited 15×
- State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1991-08-06· cited 13×
- State v. SchauerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1993-06-15· cited 9×
- State v. CondonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1993-02-23· cited 9×
- State v. AschnewitzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1992-04-14· cited 6×
- State v. ShrinerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2007-10-02· cited 5×
- State v. StranskyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-04-15· cited 3×
- State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1998-06-17· cited 2×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. OeveringSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-06-23· cited 85×
- State, Department of Public Safety v. WiehleSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-11-30· cited 25×
- State v. CapelleSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1969-11-21· cited 16×
- State v. RossowSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-10-08· cited 11×
- State v. DeweySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-12-08· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.